QUANTPHYS.bib

@COMMENT{{This file has been generated by bib2bib 1.46}}

@COMMENT{{Command line: bib2bib -ob QUANTPHYS.bib -c " ropsections:'QUANTPHYS' " bigBiblioFile.bib}}

@COMMENT{{ bigBiblioFile.bib generated by makebib.sh version }}

@COMMENT{{ concatenation of journals_ref.bib withpyblio.bib optimization.bib mypapers.bib other.bib refvulg.bib these_ref.bib philo.bib ../math/journals_ref.bib ../math/citeseer.bib ../math/books.bib }}

@COMMENT{{ date: Thu Nov 2 00:20:16 CET 2006 }}


@MISC{chaio2002heisenberg,
  AUTHOR = {R. Y. Chiao, P. G. Kwiat},
  TITLE = {Heisenberg's Introduction of the `Collapse of the
                  Wavepacket' into Quantum Mechanics},
  YEAR = {2001},
  NOTE = {Comments: 13 pages, 3 figures. Chiao's Heisenberg
                  Centennial Symposium lecture given in Bamberg,
                  Germany, in Sept. 2001},
  ROPSECTIONS = {QUANTPHYS},
  URL = {http://fr.arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0201036},
  PS = {/sci_docs/physics/papers/arxiv/chaio2002heisenberg.ps.gz},
  ABSTRACT = {Heisenberg in 1929 introduced the "collapse of the
                  wavepacket" into quantum theory. We review here an
                  experiment at Berkeley which demonstrated several
                  aspects of this idea. In this experiment, a pair of
                  daughter photons was produced in an entangled state,
                  in which the sum of their two energies was equal to
                  the sharp energy of their parent photon, in the
                  nonlinear optical process of spontaneous parametric
                  down-conversion. The wavepacket of one daughter
                  photon collapsed upon a measurement-at-a-distance of
                  the other daughter's energy, in such a way that the
                  total energy of the two-photon system was
                  conserved. Heisenberg's energy-time uncertainty
                  principle was also demonstrated to hold in this
                  experiment.}
}


@MISC{delaMadrid2002pedestrian,
  AUTHOR = {R. de la Madrid, M. Gadella},
  TITLE = {A Pedestrian Introduction to Gamow Vectors},
  YEAR = {2002},
  URL = {http://fr.arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0201091},
  PS = {/sci_docs/physics/papers/arxiv/delaMadrid2002pedestrian.ps.gz},
  ROPSECTIONS = {SMATRIX QUANTPHYS},
  ABSTRACT = { The Gamow vector description of resonances is
                  compared with the S-matrix and the Green function
                  descriptions using the example of the square barrier
                  and similar potentials. By imposing different
                  boundary conditions on the time independent
                  Schrodinger equation, we get either eigenvectors
                  corresponding to real eigenvalues (Dirac kets) and
                  the real ``physical'' spectrum or we get
                  eigenvectors corresponding to complex eigenvalues
                  (Gamow vectors) and the resonance spectrum. We will
                  show that the poles of the S-matrix are the same as
                  the poles of the Green function and as the complex
                  eigenvalues of the Schrodinger equation subject to a
                  purely outgoing boundary condition. We also obtain
                  the basis vector expansion generated by the Gamow
                  vectors. The time asymmetry built into the purely
                  outgoing boundary condition will be revealed. It
                  will be also shown that the probability to detect
                  the decay within a shell around the origin of the
                  decaying state follows the exponential law if the
                  Gamow vector (resonance) contribution to this
                  probability is the only contribution that is taken
                  into account. }
}


@ARTICLE{1464-4266-4-3-201,
  AUTHOR = {T C Weinacht and P H Bucksbaum},
  TITLE = {Using feedback for coherent control of quantum
                  systems},
  JOURNAL = {Journal of Optics B: Quantum and Semiclassical
                  Optics},
  VOLUME = {4},
  NUMBER = {3},
  PAGES = {R35-R52},
  YEAR = {2002},
  ROPSECTIONS = {PHYSX SURVEY QUANTPHYS},
  PDF = {/sci_docs/physics/papers/JOpticsB/Weinacht2002using.pdf},
  ABSTRACT = {A longstanding goal in chemical physics has been the
                  control of atoms and molecules using coherent light
                  fields. This paper provides a brief overview of the
                  field and discusses experiments that use a
                  programmable pulse shaper to control the quantum
                  state of electronic wavepackets in Rydberg atoms and
                  electronic and nuclear dynamics in molecular
                  liquids. The shape of Rydberg wavepackets was
                  controlled by using tailored ultrafast pulses to
                  excite a beam of caesium atoms. The quantum state of
                  these atoms was measured using holographic
                  techniques borrowed from optics. The experiments
                  with molecular liquids involved the construction of
                  an automated learning machine. A genetic algorithm
                  directed the choice of shaped pulses which
                  interacted with the molecular system inside a
                  learning control loop. Analysis of successful pulse
                  shapes that were found by using the genetic
                  algorithm yield insight into the systems being
                  controlled. }
}


@ARTICLE{kamefuchi,
  AUTHOR = {S. Kamefuchi},
  TITLE = {Some Considerations on Quantum Mechanics-Matter Wave
                  and Probability Wave},
  JOURNAL = {Foundations of Physics},
  YEAR = {1998},
  VOLUME = {28},
  NUMBER = {1},
  PAGES = {31--43},
  PUBLISHER = {Kluwer/Plenum},
  URL = {http://leporello.catchword.com/vl=5116453/cl=15/nw=1/rpsv/catchword/plenum/00159018/v28n1/s2/p31},
  PDF = {/sci_docs/physics/papers/FoundPhys/kamefuchi1998considerations.pdf},
  ROPSECTIONS = {QUANTPHYS},
  ABSTRACT = {It is argued that the distinction between matter
                  wave and probability wave is made clear when the
                  problem is considered from the field-theory
                  viewpoint . Interference can take place for each of
                  these waves , and the similarity as well as
                  dissimilarity between the two cases is discussed .}
}


@ARTICLE{braginsky1998galileo,
  AUTHOR = { V. B. Braginsky},
  TITLE = {From Galileo's Pendulum to a Quantum One (A Short
                  Review)},
  JOURNAL = {Foundations of Physics },
  YEAR = {1998},
  VOLUME = {28},
  NUMBER = {1},
  PAGES = {125--130},
  URL = {http://leporello.catchword.com/vl=5116453/cl=15/nw=1/rpsv/catchword/plenum/00159018/v28n1/s7/p125},
  PDF = {/sci_docs/physics/papers/FoundPhys/braginsky1998galileo.pdf},
  ROPSECTIONS = {QUANTPHYS SURVEY}
}


@ARTICLE{kimball1998states,
  AUTHOR = {J. C. Kimball},
  TITLE = {States on the Sierpinski Triangle},
  JOURNAL = {Foundations of Physics },
  YEAR = {1998},
  VOLUME = {28},
  NUMBER = {1},
  PAGES = {87--105},
  URL = {http://leporello.catchword.com/vl=5116453/cl=15/nw=1/rpsv/catchword/plenum/00159018/v28n1/s5/p87},
  PDF = {/sci_docs/physics/papers/FoundPhys/kimball1998states.pdf},
  ROPSECTIONS = {LOCALIZATION QUANTPHYS RG},
  ABSTRACT = {States on a Sierpinski triangle are described using
                  a formally exact and general Hamiltonian
                  renormalization . The spectra of new (as well as
                  previously examined) models are characterized
                  . Numerical studies based on the renormalization
                  suggest that the only models which exhibit
                  absolutely continuous specta are effectively
                  one-dimensional in the limit of large distances . }
}


@ARTICLE{0034-4885-61-2-002,
  AUTHOR = {Andrew Steane},
  TITLE = {Quantum computing},
  JOURNAL = {Reports on Progress in Physics},
  VOLUME = {61},
  NUMBER = {2},
  PAGES = {117-173},
  YEAR = {1998},
  NOTE = {quant-ph/9708022},
  URL = {http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/quant-ph/9708022},
  PDF = {/sci_docs/physics/papers/RepProgPhys/steane1997quantum.pdf},
  ROPSECTIONS = {QUANTPHYS SURVEY},
  ABSTRACT = {The subject of quantum computing brings together
                  ideas from classical information theory, computer
                  science, and quantum physics. This review aims to
                  summarize not just quantum computing, but the whole
                  subject of quantum information theory. Information
                  can be identified as the most general thing which
                  must propagate from a cause to an effect. It
                  therefore has a fundamentally important role in the
                  science of physics. However, the mathematical
                  treatment of information, especially information
                  processing, is quite recent, dating from the
                  mid-20th century. This has meant that the full
                  significance of information as a basic concept in
                  physics is only now being discovered. This is
                  especially true in quantum mechanics. The theory of
                  quantum information and computing puts this
                  significance on a firm footing, and has led to some
                  profound and exciting new insights into the natural
                  world. Among these are the use of quantum states to
                  permit the secure transmission of classical
                  information (quantum cryptography), the use of
                  quantum entanglement to permit reliable transmission
                  of quantum states (teleportation), the possibility
                  of preserving quantum coherence in the presence of
                  irreversible noise processes (quantum error
                  correction), and the use of controlled quantum
                  evolution for efficient computation (quantum
                  computation). The common theme of all these insights
                  is the use of quantum entanglement as a
                  computational resource. It turns out that
                  information theory and quantum mechanics fit
                  together very well. In order to explain their
                  relationship, this review begins with an
                  introduction to classical information theory and
                  computer science, including Shannon's theorem, error
                  correcting codes, Turing machines and computational
                  complexity. The principles of quantum mechanics are
                  then outlined, and the Einstein, Podolsky and Rosen
                  (EPR) experiment described. The EPR-Bell
                  correlations, and quantum entanglement in general,
                  form the essential new ingredient which
                  distinguishes quantum from classical information
                  theory and, arguably, quantum from classical
                  physics. Basic quantum information ideas are next
                  outlined, including qubits and data compression,
                  quantum gates, the `no cloning' property and
                  teleportation. Quantum cryptography is briefly
                  sketched. The universal quantum computer (QC) is
                  described, based on the Church-Turing principle and
                  a network model of computation. Algorithms for such
                  a computer are discussed, especially those for
                  finding the period of a function, and searching a
                  random list. Such algorithms prove that a QC of
                  sufficiently precise construction is not only
                  fundamentally different from any computer which can
                  only manipulate classical information, but can
                  compute a small class of functions with greater
                  efficiency. This implies that some important
                  computational tasks are impossible for any device
                  apart from a QC. To build a universal QC is well
                  beyond the abilities of current technology. However,
                  the principles of quantum information physics can be
                  tested on smaller devices. The current experimental
                  situation is reviewed, with emphasis on the linear
                  ion trap, high-Q optical cavities, and nuclear
                  magnetic resonance methods. These allow coherent
                  control in a Hilbert space of eight dimensions
                  (three qubits) and should be extendable up to a
                  thousand or more dimensions (10 qubits). Among other
                  things, these systems will allow the feasibility of
                  quantum computing to be assessed. In fact such
                  experiments are so difficult that it seemed likely
                  until recently that a practically useful QC
                  (requiring, say, 1000 qubits) was actually ruled out
                  by considerations of experimental imprecision and
                  the unavoidable coupling between any system and its
                  environment. However, a further fundamental part of
                  quantum information physics provides a solution to
                  this impasse. This is quantum error correction
                  (QEC). An introduction to QEC is provided. The
                  evolution of the QC is restricted to a carefully
                  chosen subspace of its Hilbert space. Errors are
                  almost certain to cause a departure from this
                  subspace. QEC provides a means to detect and undo
                  such departures without upsetting the quantum
                  computation. This achieves the apparently
                  impossible, since the computation preserves quantum
                  coherence even though during its course all the
                  qubits in the computer will have relaxed
                  spontaneously many times. The review concludes with
                  an outline of the main features of quantum
                  information physics and avenues for future
                  research.}
}


@ARTICLE{doncheski2002quantum,
  AUTHOR = {M. A. Doncheski and R. W. Robinett},
  TITLE = {Quantum Mechanical Analysis of the Equilateral
                  Triangle Billiard: Periodic Orbit Theory and Wave
                  Packet Revivals},
  JOURNAL = { Annals of Physics},
  YEAR = {2002},
  VOLUME = {299},
  NUMBER = {2},
  PAGES = {208--227},
  MONTH = {August},
  ROPSECTIONS = {QUANTPHYS MULTISCATT},
  PDF = {/sci_docs/physics/papers/AnnPhys/doncheski2002quantum.pdf},
  ABSTRACT = {Using the fact that the energy eigenstates of the
                  equilateral triangle infinite well (or billiard) are
                  available in closed form, we examine the connections
                  between the energy eigenvalue spectrum and the
                  classical closed paths in this geometry, using both
                  periodic orbit theory and the short-term
                  semi-classical behavior of wave packets. We also
                  discuss wave packet revivals and show that there are
                  exact revivals, for all wave packets, at times given
                  by (Eq) where a and µ are the length of one side and
                  the mass of the point particle, respectively. We
                  find additional cases of exact revivals with shorter
                  revival times for zero-momentum wave packets
                  initially located at special symmetry points inside
                  the billiard. Finally, we discuss simple variations
                  on the equilateral (60°-60°-60°) triangle, such as
                  the half equilateral (30°-60°-90°) triangle and
                  other "foldings," which have related energy spectra
                  and revival structures.}
}


@ARTICLE{omnes1992consistent,
  AUTHOR = {Roland Omn{\`e}s},
  TITLE = {Consistent interpretations of quantum mechanics},
  JOURNAL = {Rev. Mod. Phys.},
  YEAR = {1992},
  VOLUME = {64},
  NUMBER = {2},
  PAGES = {339--382},
  MONTH = {April},
  ROPSECTIONS = {QUANTPHYS},
  URL = {http://link.aps.org/abstract/RMP/v64/p339},
  PDF = {/sci_docs/physics/papers/RMP/omnes1992consistent.pdf},
  ABSTRACT = {Within the last decade, significant progress has
                  been made towards a consistent and complete
                  reformulation of the Copenhagen interpretation (an
                  interpretation consisting in a formulation of the
                  experimental aspects of physics in terms of the
                  basic formalism; it is consistent if free from
                  internal contradiction and complete if it provides
                  precise predictions for all experiments). The main
                  steps involved decoherence (the transition from
                  linear superpositions of macroscopic states to a
                  mixing), Griffiths histories describing the
                  evolution of quantum properties, a convenient
                  logical structure for dealing with histories, and
                  also some progress in semiclassical physics, which
                  was made possible by new methods. The main outcome
                  is a theory of phenomena, viz., the classically
                  meaningful properties of a macroscopic system. It
                  shows in particular how and when determinism is
                  valid. This theory can be used to give a deductive
                  form to measurement theory, which now covers some
                  cases that were initially devised as counterexamples
                  against the Copenhagen interpretation. These
                  theories are described, together with their
                  applications to some key experiments and some of
                  their consequences concerning epistemology.}
}


@ARTICLE{oppenheim2002temporal,
  AUTHOR = {J Oppenheim and B Reznik and W G Unruh},
  TITLE = {Temporal ordering in quantum mechanics},
  JOURNAL = {Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General},
  VOLUME = {35},
  NUMBER = {35},
  PAGES = {7641-7652},
  YEAR = {2002},
  ROPSECTIONS = {TIME QUANTPHYS},
  PDF = {/sci_docs/physics/papers/JPhysA/oppenheim2002temporal.pdf},
  ABSTRACT = {We examine the measurability of the temporal
                  ordering of two events, as well as event
                  coincidences. In classical mechanics, a measurement
                  of the order-of-arrival of two particles is shown to
                  be equivalent to a measurement involving only one
                  particle (in higher dimensions). In quantum
                  mechanics, we find that diffraction effects
                  introduce a minimum inaccuracy to which the temporal
                  order-of-arrival can be determined
                  unambiguously. The minimum inaccuracy of the
                  measurement is given by deltat = hbar/bar E where
                  bar E is the total kinetic energy of the two
                  particles. Similar restrictions apply to the case of
                  coincidence measurements. We show that these
                  limitations are much weaker than limitations on
                  measuring the time-of-arrival of a particle to a
                  fixed location.}
}


@ARTICLE{valdenebro2002assumptions,
  AUTHOR = {Angel G Valdenebro},
  TITLE = {Assumptions underlying Bell's inequalities},
  JOURNAL = {European Journal of Physics},
  VOLUME = {23},
  NUMBER = {5},
  PAGES = {569-577},
  YEAR = {2002},
  ROPSECTIONS = {QUANTPHYS},
  PDF = {/sci_docs/physics/papers/NewJPhys/valdenebro2002assumptions.pdf},
  ABSTRACT = {There are several versions of Bell's inequalities
                  (BI), proved in different contexts, using different
                  sets of assumptions. The discussions of their
                  experimental violation often disregard some required
                  assumptions and loosely use formulations of
                  others. The issue, to judge from recent
                  publications, continues to cause
                  misunderstandings. We present a very simple but
                  general proof of BI, identifying explicitly the
                  complete set of assumptions required. }
}


@ARTICLE{sica1999bell-I,
  AUTHOR = {Louis Sica},
  TITLE = {Bell's inequalities I: An explanation for their
                  experimental violation },
  JOURNAL = {Optics Communications},
  YEAR = {1999},
  VOLUME = {170},
  NUMBER = {1-3},
  PAGES = {55-60},
  MONTH = {October},
  ROPSECTIONS = {QUANTPHYS},
  PDF = {/sci_docs/physics/papers/OptComm/sica1999bell-II.pdf},
  ABSTRACT = {Derivations of two Bell's inequalities are given in
                  a form appropriate to the interpretation of
                  experimental data for explicit determination of all
                  the correlations. They are arithmetic identities
                  independent of statistical reasoning and thus cannot
                  be violated by data that meets the conditions for
                  their validity. Two experimentally performable
                  procedures are described to meet these
                  conditions. Once such data are acquired, it follows
                  that the measured correlations cannot all equal a
                  negative cosine of angular differences. The relation
                  between this finding and the predictions of quantum
                  mechanics is discussed in a companion paper.}
}


@ARTICLE{sica1999bell-II,
  AUTHOR = {Louis Sica},
  TITLE = {Bell's inequalities II: Logical loophole in their
                  interpretation},
  JOURNAL = {Optics Communications},
  YEAR = {1999},
  VOLUME = {170},
  NUMBER = {1-3},
  PAGES = {61-66},
  MONTH = {October},
  ROPSECTIONS = {QUANTPHYS},
  PDF = {/sci_docs/physics/papers/OptComm/sica1999bell-II.pdf},
  ABSTRACT = {Assumed data streams from a delayed choice gedanken
                  experiment must satisfy a Bell's identity
                  independently of locality assumptions. The violation
                  of Bell's inequality by assumed correlations of
                  identical form among these data streams implies that
                  they cannot all result from statistically equivalent
                  variables of a homogeneous process. This is
                  consistent with both the requirements of arithmetic
                  and distinctions between commuting and noncommuting
                  observables in quantum mechanics. Neglect of these
                  distinctions implies a logical loophole in the
                  conventional interpretation of Bell's inequalities.}
}


@ARTICLE{bell1964EPR,
  AUTHOR = {J. S. Bell},
  TITLE = {On the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen Paradox},
  JOURNAL = {Physics},
  YEAR = {1964},
  VOLUME = {1},
  PAGES = {195--200},
  ROPSECTIONS = {QUANTPHYS}
}


@ARTICLE{hall2002schrodinger,
  AUTHOR = {Michael J W Hall and Marcel Reginatto},
  TITLE = {Schr\"{o}dinger equation from an exact uncertainty
                  principle},
  JOURNAL = {Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General},
  VOLUME = {35},
  NUMBER = {14},
  PAGES = {3289-3303},
  YEAR = {2002},
  ROPSECTIONS = {QUANTPHYS},
  PDF = {/sci_docs/physics/papers/JPhysA/hall2002schrodinger.pdf},
  ABSTRACT = {An exact uncertainty principle, formulated as the
                  assumption that a classical ensemble is subject to
                  random momentum fluctuations of a strength which is
                  determined by and scales inversely with uncertainty
                  in position, leads from the classical equations of
                  motion to the Schr\"{o}dinger equation. }
}


@INCOLLECTION{clauser2002early,
  AUTHOR = {John F. Clauser},
  TITLE = {Early history of Bell's theorem},
  BOOKTITLE = {Quantum [un]speakable. From Bell to Quantum
                  Information.},
  OPTCROSSREF = {},
  PAGES = {61--98},
  PUBLISHER = {Springer-Verlag},
  YEAR = {2002},
  EDITOR = {R. A. Bertlmann and A. Zeilinger},
  ROPSECTIONS = {QUANTPHYS},
  OPTVOLUME = {},
  OPTNUMBER = {},
  OPTSERIES = {},
  OPTTYPE = {},
  OPTCHAPTER = {},
  OPTADDRESS = {},
  OPTEDITION = {},
  OPTMONTH = {},
  OPTNOTE = {},
  OPTANNOTE = {}
}


@ARTICLE{jirari2002renormalisation,
  AUTHOR = {H. Jiraria and H. Kr\"{o}ger  X. Q. Luo and G. Melkonyan and K. J. M. Moriarty},
  TITLE = {Renormalisation in quantum mechanics },
  JOURNAL = {Physics Letters A},
  YEAR = {2002},
  OPTKEY = {},
  VOLUME = {303},
  NUMBER = {5--6},
  PAGES = {299--306},
  MONTH = {October},
  OPTNOTE = {},
  OPTANNOTE = {},
  PDF = {/sci_docs/physics/papers/PhysLettA/jirari2002renormalisation.pdf},
  ROPSECTIONS = {RG QUANTPHYS},
  ABSTRACT = {We study a recently proposed quantum action depending on
  temperature. At zero temperature the quantum action is obtained
  analytically and reproduces the exact ground state energy and wave
  function. This is demonstrated for a number of cases with parity
  symmetric confining potentials. In the case of the hydrogen atom, it
  also reproduces exactly energy and wave function of a subset of
  excited state (those of lowest energy for given angular momentum l)
  and the quantum action is consistent with O(4) symmetry. In the case
  of a double-well potential, the quantum action generates the ground
  state of double-hump shape. In all cases we observe a coincidence
  (in position) of minima of the quantum potential with maxima of the
  wave function. The semi-classical WKB formula for the ground state
  wave function becomes exact after replacing the parameters of the
  classical action by those of quantum action.}
}


@ARTICLE{bassi2000general,
  AUTHOR = {Angelo Bassi and GianCarlo Ghirardi},
  TITLE = {A general argument against the universal validity of the superposition principle },
  JOURNAL = {Physics Letters A},
  YEAR = {2000},
  VOLUME = {275},
  NUMBER = {5--6},
  PAGES = {373--381},
  MONTH = {October},
  PDF = {/sci_docs/physics/papers/PhysLettA/bassi2000general.pdf},
  ROPSECTIONS = {QUANTPHYS},
  ABSTRACT = {We reconsider a well-known problem of quantum theory,
  i.e. the so-called measurement (or macro-objectification) problem,
  and we rederive the fact that it gives rise to serious problems of
  interpretation. The novelty of our approach derives from the fact
  that the relevant conclusion is obtained in a completely general
  way, in particular, without resorting to any of the assumptions of
  ideality which are usually done for the measurement process. The
  generality and unescapability of our assumptions (we take into
  account possible malfunctionings of the apparatus, its unavoidable
  entanglement with the environmment, its high but not absolute
  reliability, its fundamentally uncontrollable features) allow to
  draw the conclusion that the very possibility of performing
  measurements on a microsystem combined with the assumed general
  validity of the linear nature of quantum evolution leads to a
  fundamental contradiction. }
}


@ARTICLE{grangier2002contextual,
  AUTHOR = {Philippe Grangier},
  TITLE = {Contextual objectivity: a realistic interpretation of quantum mechanics},
  JOURNAL = {European Journal of Physics},
  VOLUME = {23},
  NUMBER = {3},
  PAGES = {331-337},
  YEAR = {2002},
  PDF = {/sci_docs/physics/papers/JPhysA/grangier2002contextual.pdf},
  ROPSECTIONS = {QUANTPHYS},
  ABSTRACT = {An attempt is made to formulate quantum mechanics (QM) in
  physical rather than in mathematical terms. It is argued that the
  appropriate conceptual framework for QM is `contextual objectivity',
  which includes an objective definition of the quantum state. This
  point of view sheds new light on topics such as the reduction
  postulate and the quantum measurement process. }
}


@ARTICLE{zeh2003quantization,
  AUTHOR = {H. D. Zeh},
  TITLE = {There is no "first" quantization},
  JOURNAL = {Physics Letters A},
  YEAR = {2003},
  VOLUME = {309},
  NUMBER = {5--6},
  PAGES = {329--334},
  MONTH = {March},
  ROPSECTIONS = {QFT QUANTPHYS},
  PDF = {/sci_docs/physics/papers/PhysLettA/zeh2003quantization.pdf},
  ABSTRACT = {The introduction of spinor and other massive fields by
  "quantizing" particles (corpuscles) is conceptually misleading. Only
  spatial fields must be postulated to form the fundamental objects to
  be quantized (that is, to define a formal basis for all quantum
  states), while apparent "particles" are a mere consequence of
  decoherence. This conclusion is also supported by the nature of
  gauge fields.}
}


@ARTICLE{agnese1997clues,
  AUTHOR = {A. Agnese and R. Festa},
  TITLE = {Clues to discretization on the cosmic scale},
  JOURNAL = {Physics Letters A},
  YEAR = {1997},
  VOLUME = {227},
  PAGES = {165},
  ROPSECTIONS = {QUANTPHYS COSMOLOGY},
  PDF = {/sci_docs/physics/papers/PhysLettA/agnese1997clues.pdf}
}


@ARTICLE{taylor1997teaching,
  AUTHOR = {Edwin F. Taylor and Stamatis Vokos and John M. O Meara and Nora S. Thornber},
  TITLE = {Teaching Feynman s sum-over-paths quantum theory},
  JOURNAL = {Computers in Physics},
  YEAR = {1998},
  VOLUME = {12},
  NUMBER = {2},
  PAGES = {190--199},
  ROPSECTIONS = {LECTURE QUANTPHYS},
  PDF = {/sci_docs/physics/papers/computerInPhysics/taylor1997teaching.pdf},
  ABSTRACT = {We outline an introduction to quantum mechanics based on the
sum-over-paths method originated by Richard P. Feynman. Students use
software with a graphics interface to model sums associated with
multiple paths for photons and electrons, leading to the concepts of
electron wavefunction, the propagator, bound states, and stationary
states. Material in the first portion of this outline has been tried
with an audience of high-school science teachers. These students were
enthusiastic about the treatment, and we feel that it has promise for
the education of physicists and other scientists, as well as for
distribution to a wider audience.  }
}


@ARTICLE{1998A&A...335..281H,
  AUTHOR = {{Hermann}, R. and {Schumacher}, G. and {Guyard}, R.},
  TITLE = {{Scale relativity and quantization of the solar system. Orbit quantization of the planet's satellites}},
  JOURNAL = {Astron. Astrophysics},
  YEAR = 1998,
  MONTH = JUL,
  VOLUME = 335,
  PAGES = {281-286},
  ADSURL = {http://adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-bib_query?bibcode=1998A%26A...335..281H&db_key=AST},
  ADSNOTE = {Provided by the NASA Astrophysics Data System},
  PDF = {/sci_docs/physics/papers/AstronAstrophys/hermann1998scale_relativity.pdf},
  ROPSECTIONS = {QUANTPHYS}
}

@COMMENT{{ThisfilehasbeengeneratedbyPybliographer}}


@BOOK{cohen1973mecanique,
  AUTHOR = {Claude Cohen-Tannoudji and Bernard Diu and Franck Lalo{\"e}},
  ALTEDITOR = {},
  TITLE = {M{\'e}canique quantique},
  PUBLISHER = {Hermann},
  YEAR = {1973},
  VOLUME = {I et II},
  ROPSECTIONS = {QUANTPHYS}
}


@MISC{accardi2000locality,
  AUTHOR = {Luigi Accardi and Massimo Regoli},
  TITLE = {Locality and Bell's inequality},
  YEAR = {2000},
  HOWPUBLISHED = { A talk given at Capri conference},
  MONTH = {July},
  NOTE = {quant-ph/0007005 -- 23 pages},
  ROPSECTIONS = {QUANTPHYS},
  PS = {/sci_docs/physics/papers/arxiv/accardi2000locality.ps.gz},
  ABSTRACT = {We prove that the locality condition is irrelevant
                  to Bell in equality. We check that the real origin
                  of the Bell's inequality is the assumption of
                  applicability of classical (Kolmogorovian)
                  probability theory to quantum mechanics. We describe
                  the chameleon effect which allows to construct an
                  experiment realizing a local, realistic, classical,
                  deterministic and macroscopic violation of the Bell
                  inequalities. }
}


@MISC{adenier2000refutation,
  AUTHOR = {Guillaume Adenier},
  TITLE = {A Refutation of Bell's Theorem},
  HOWPUBLISHED = {http://fr.arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0006014},
  OPTMONTH = {June},
  YEAR = {2000},
  ROPSECTIONS = {QUANTPHYS},
  ABSTRACT = {Bell's Theorem was developed on the basis of
                  considerations involving a linear combination of
                  spin correlation functions, each of which has a
                  distinct pair of arguments. The simultaneous
                  presence of these different pairs of arguments in
                  the same equation can be understood in two radically
                  different ways: either as `strongly objective,' that
                  is, all correlation functions pertain to the same
                  set of particle pairs, or as `weakly objective,'
                  that is, each correlation function pertains to a
                  different set of particle pairs. It is demonstrated
                  that once this meaning is determined, no discrepancy
                  appears between local realistic theories and quantum
                  mechanics: the discrepancy in Bell's Theorem is due
                  only to a meaningless comparison between a local
                  realistic inequality written within the strongly
                  objective interpretation (thus relevant to a single
                  set of particle pairs) and a quantum mechanical
                  prediction derived from a weakly objective
                  interpretation (thus relevant to several different
                  sets of particle pairs). }
}


@ARTICLE{cramer1986transactional,
  AUTHOR = {John G. Cramer},
  TITLE = {The transactional interpretation of quantum
                  mechanics},
  JOURNAL = {Rev. Mod. Phys.},
  YEAR = {1986},
  VOLUME = {58},
  PAGES = {647--688},
  MONTH = {July},
  ROPSECTIONS = {QUANTPHYS},
  URLDOCUMENT = {/sci_docs/physics/papers/RMP/TI/}
}


@ARTICLE{youssef1993quantum,
  AUTHOR = {S. Youssef},
  TITLE = {Quantum Mechanics as Complex Probability Theory},
  JOURNAL = {Mod.Phys.Lett. A},
  YEAR = {1994},
  VOLUME = {9},
  PAGES = {2571-2586},
  URL = {http://fr.arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/9307019},
  PS = {/sci_docs/physics/papers/arxiv/youssef1993quantum.ps.gz},
  ROPSECTIONS = {QUANTPHYS BAYES},
  NOTE = {http://fr.arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/9307019},
  ABSTRACT = {Realistic quantum mechanics based on complex
                  probability theory is shown to have a frequency
                  interpretation, to coexist with Bell's theorem, to
                  be linear, to include wavefunctions which are
                  expansions in eigenfunctions of Hermitian operators
                  and to describe both pure and mixed
                  systems. Illustrative examples are given. The
                  quantum version of Bayesian inference is
                  discussed. }
}


This file has been generated by bibtex2html 1.46 . Bibliography collected by S. Correia.